First Reviews of Garth Davis' Joaquin Phoenix/Rooney Mara-starring "Mary Magdalene" Are Not Good At All

Fresh off his feature-directing debut "Lion," Garth Davis' decision to make a movie about Mary and Jesus was perceived as rather odd.  However, the fact that Rooney Mara and Joaquin Phoenix star as, respectively, Mary and Jesus is enough to have any true movie lover root for this film. Two of the best actors of their generation take on a story thousands of years old, but are supposed to bring a feminist twist to the surroundings.  

“Mary Magdalene” will be released on March 30th which of course coincides with Easter and Passover, so there clearly is an urge to tap to a certain market with this latest biblical feature, but initial reviews of the film are now in and it doesn’t look good.

Variety: “Hushed, deliberate and realized with considerable care and beauty, the resulting film has its heart entirely in the right place; its pulse, unfortunately, is far harder to locate.”

THR: ” ‘Mary Magdalene’ is an uneasy viewing experience, ponderous and disjointed in places, but also crafted with conviction and a strong aesthetic vision.”

Entertainment Ireland: “It’s difficult to say how well a movie based around religion will do in the modern day, but if you open yourself up to it, ‘Mary Magdalene’ is rewarding on many levels.”

Indiewire: “As Godly spectacle, the film is too introverted to be overwhelming: in place of miracles and wonders, we get pauses and shuffles. Everything ‘Lion’ made transporting and otherwise moving – the sense of youth finding its chosen place in the world – turns repetitious and uninvolving in the draggy second act.”

The Guardian: “This movie, from screenwriters Helen Edmundson and Philippa Goslett and director Garth Davis, sets itself a bold task: to rescue Mary Magdalene from an age-old tradition of patriarchal condescension and misinterpretation. And yet it winds up embracing a solemn, softly-spoken and slow-moving Christian piety of its own.”

Screen Daily: “On viewing this clearly well-intentioned, attractive, wistful-to-the-point-of-inertia film, it’s easy enough to see why Mary Magdalene has languished: if it’s not exactly a hot-ticket for the Catholic faithful, neither is it something the arthouse might yearn to see.”

The Wrap: “Other than to show that a woman called Mary who wasn’t a prostitute was involved in the final weeks of the Jesus story, I have no idea what the filmmakers wanted for this project. I’m pretty sure they didn’t achieve it.”

The Weinstein Company, which owns this film, have filed for bankruptcy, which does leave us thinking if there ever will be a release, maybe VOD or streaming? Netflix to the rescue of another box-office bomb?

Jeff Daniels Believes Woody Allen Molested Dylan but Would Possibly Work With Him Again



We've been covering the Woody Allen saga left and right ever since Dylan Farrow's sexual abuse allegations against her 82-year-old father were reignited courtesy of the #TimesUp and #MeToo movements late last year. Mia Farrow and her kids Ronan and Dylan have vehemently stayed true to their convictions, even as Alec Baldwin was condemning them as basically liars earlier this month,  and that has no doubt raised a spark akin to a domino effect in the industry with Ellen PageGreta GerwigRebecca Hall, and Timothée Chalamet all expressing remorse in having worked with the director in the past. Allen's reputation has taken a major hit that will no doubt have Amazon wondering what their next move should be in regards to that nice, big contract Allen signed with them a few years back. Will they change their tune on the director? Who knows.

It seems like there's no middle of the road when it comes to Woody, you either are with him, believe his side of the story, or are aggressively against him and side with Mia, Dylan and Ronan (of note, older brother Moses says they are lying as well). However, Jeff Daniels, in a strange bit of pronouncement, whom has worked with Allen in 1985 on the indisputably great “The Purple Rose of Cairo,” also starring Mia Farrow, seems to be taking the middle of the road when it comes to Allen. Daniels and co-star Peter Sarsgaard were on “Meet the Press Daily” promoting the Hulu series “The Looming Tower,” when host Chuck Todd asked them about working with Allen, Sarsgaard was in 'Blue Jasmine," playing Cate Blanchett's boy-toy on the side. If the latter said he would refuse to work with Allen in the foreseeable future, Daniels was odd in his response, believing Dylan's accusations but still tempted to work with Woody:

“It’s a difficult decision because of ‘Purple Rose of Cairo,'” Daniels said. “That movie will always be a great experience, a great movie for me, and he will always be a great American filmmaker. I got to work with him at the age of 30, and it changed my life.”

“I believe Dylan Farrow, would I do another one with Woody? The difficult decision would be to turn him down.” said Daniels whose big break in “The Purple Rose of Cairo,” garnered the 53-year-old actor a Golden Globe nomination.

So, let me get this straight, the actorbelieves Dylan when she says that her dad molester her back in the summer of 1992, when when she was just 7 years of age but would still think about working with the "perpetrator" again? That is morally skewed. Don't get me wrong, it's fine to believe Allen's accusations might not be true, everyone has the right to due justice and some of the gaping holes in the Mia/Dylan account do give one the assumption of doubt in this case, but if you really believe that a 56-year-old Allen committed such a heinous act towards a 7 year-old then why in the living hell would you want to work with that kind of person again?


“The Looming Tower,” a 10-episode mini-series from Hulu, will premiere on February 28

Rian Johnson Says “Solo: A Star Wars Story” is “Beautiful” & “Funny”

Director Rian Johnson has some encouraging words for the Star Wars universe after seeing the Han Solo movie for the first time.

It’s quite crazy how the storm that was “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” is almost 4 months old. In fact, Director Rian Johnson‘s divisive but landmark “Star Wars” film is about to be released via Digital HD on March 13th, and will be available on Blu-ray and DVD come March 27th.

Just like any company in charge of a profitable film about to be released on home video, Lucasfilm is now in full-fledged promotional mode for “The Last Jedi,” and then afterwards they can then turn their attentions to “Solo: A Star Wars Story” which will be released this coming May.  Director Johnson has, of course, been making the promotional rounds. Speaking with ComicBook at the AARP Movies for Grownup Awards, he was asked about “Solo” and it seems like he’s seen it and has given it his stamp of approval:

“ … I think it looks so beautiful. I can’t wait for people to see more of the film – it’s so fun, it’s so funny. The cast is so charismatic, and I think they all just did a great job with it.”

“Solo: A Star Wars Story” has had a tumultuous production, just like its other spin-off counterpart “Rogue One: A Star Wars Story.”  The firing of Directors Chris Miller and Phil Lord complicated things, so did the hire of an acting coach for the film’s star Alden Ehrenreich, which resulted in heavy re-shoots by newly hired director Ron Howard.

Of course, we should take whatever Johnson says with a major grain of salt, he is, after all, a heavily invested property over at Disney and Lucasfilm, where they have just hired him to write a whole separate trilogy of ‘Star Wars” films. Nevertheless, it’s great to hear something, anything, positive about “Solo” which has been shunned off by many, who clearly haven’t seen it but have very much heard about the on-set chaos, tension, and figured it surely had to be a non-starter. Disney is no doubt in damage control mode at the moment and trying to turn the tide of conversation back to the positive. The impressive Super Bowl trailer helped, so did the hire of the legendary John Williams to compose the score, oh and that whole Lord/Miller controversy? Thrown out of the back window as the very competent Ron Howard (“Rush,” “Apollo 13,” “Cinderella Man,” Frost/Nixon,” “A Beautiful Mind”) will surely bring his gift for staging clear and concise action but never losing touch of character. Howard seems to have just made his own version of the film and heavily re-shot most of it, which is fine by us as we don’t really want another clash of visions, ala Whedon/Snyder, to ever happen in a major blockbuster again.

“Solo: A Star Wars Story” premieres in theaters on May 25th.

[The Playlist]

Some folks do still believe, including myself.

Yesterday on Facebook I, again, predicted that Jordan Peele‘s "Get Out" will win the Best Picture Oscar. Then I doubled-down on Twitter.

Jeffrey Wells over at Hollywood Elsewhere had something to say about that:
"What he means is that Get Out, a half creepy, half satiric, racially-stamped Stepford Wives, will slipslide into a win because a huge number of Academy members have it down as their #2 or #3 choice, and that the “kooky” preferential ballot will do the rest."
"Hollywood Elsewhere says no way. I’m not even sure that Get Out will win the Best Original Screenplay Oscar, which will most likely be won by Three Billboards‘ Martin McDonagh. It might win in this category, but forget Best Picture — the apparent momentum of the last week has all been with Three Billboards with everyone assuming that The Shape of Water‘s Guillermo del Toro will take Best Director."
"I’ll say this much: One thing favoring Get Out is that the people who love it really love it, while the Three Billboards and Shape of Water crowd is more composed of likers and accomodationists"

Joaquin Phoenix has no idea he's supposed to play The Joker

Image result for joaquin phoenix beard

Earlier in the month in the article "Joaquin Phoenix to Play The Joker In Todd Philips' Untitled Joker Origin Movie" I revealed that Joaquin Phoenix was going to, most likely, play the Joker in a standalone, non-DCEU, movie. A film which would pretend, if only, that Jared Leto's take on the Joker in “Suicide Squad” never existed. And yet, Phoenix, always living in his own strange world, had no clue what Allocine was talking about when they asked him about the role, puzzled by the question he said:

 “What movie about the Joker?” he asked, and as the interviewer probed further, Phoenix simply said, “I have no idea what you’re talking about.”

God bless him.

I originally wrote about Phoenix' possible Joker role:

It seems like the WB has finally found its Joker for Todd Phillips’ untitled Joker origin movie. According to Variety, none other than Joaquin Phoenix will play Batman's arch nemesis. Contractual negotiations are currently not underway, but, according to the daily, "Phillips has made it clear that Phoenix was his top choice to star .... and after thinking it over, Phoenix has agreed to the role."

Phillips will direct and co-write the screenplay. The director had met Phoenix before the new year and was just waiting for the WB to give him the green light to cast Phoenix.  Rumors had circulated that Leonardo DiCaprio was Phillips' original choice to play The Joker but that fell through. All the better, Phoenix as the Joker makes more sense than DiCaprio.

[The Playlist]

The 15:17 To Paris: Seitz Gets It Right

Matt Zoller Seitz wrote a great final paragraph in his mixed review of Clint Eastwood's "The 15:17 To Paris:
"The movie's greatest virtue, which might be enough to make it a critic-proof hit no matter what, is its poker faced sincerity. This extends to faithfully reproducing a Red State worldview that was also showcased in "American Sniper" and "Sully." A lot of U.S. moviegoers are going to feel seen by this film, and that's a net gain for American cinema, which is supposed to be a populist art form representing the body politic as it is, not merely as the industry wishes it could be. If only someone could've heroically intervened to save this movie."

My magical crystal ball says “Get Out” is winning Best Picture on March 4th

Image result for get out

What I foresee is a scenario where Shape and Three Billboards x out each other and Get Out takes Best Picture. My dark horse is Phantom Thread, but it's mostly me just dreaming rather than actual concrete data pointing towards PTA's film. Also, the academy membership has drastically changed over the past two years, they keep adding younger, more hip members. To what extent that could shape the race, I don't know. These are new, very exciting times for the Academy, "Shape" is the old-school vote, "Get Out" is the new-school, "Three Billboards" is the I'm-not-sure-what-but-it's-good-pick. A film like "Moonlight" would never, in a million years, win Best Picture or even be nominated pre-#Oscarssowhite. Which isn't a diss towards Barry Jenkins' film, it's just not an old-school "Oscar" movie. Is that a preview of how the Academy will vote for the next 20 years? Who knows.

‘Black Panther’ has 2nd best sophomore weekend in US box office history - It has also now earned $704 million worldwide in two weeks. “Justice League” made $657 million after fourteen weeks.

Image result for black panther 600x200

Despite my mixed review of “Black Panther,” the film is still king at the box-office earning more than $108 million in its second week. Consequentially, "Black Panther" boasted the 2nd best sophomore weekend in US box office history, only beaten by the massive second week for “The Avengers.”  However,“Black Panther” is expected to hit $400 million domestically, which would be attained faster than "The Avengers."  “Black Panther” has now earned  $704 million worldwide in two weeks. “Justice League” made $657 million after fourteen weeks. 

According to CNBC:

"Black Panther" trails only "Star Wars: The Force Awakens," which earned $149.2 million in its second Friday-Sunday window. It edges out "Jurassic World" and "Marvel's Avengers," which earned $106.6 million and $103.1 million, respectively."

1. “Black Panther”  $108 million 
2. “Game Night”  $16.6 million
3. “Peter Rabbit”  $12.5 million 
4. “Annihilation”  $11 million
5. “Fifty Shades Freed”  $6.9 million 
6. “Jumanji: Welcome To The Jungle”  $5.6 million 
7. “The 15:17 To Paris”  $3.6 million 
8. “The Greatest Showman”  $3.4 million 
9. “Every Day”  $3.1 million
10. “Early Man”  $1.7 million 

[The Playlist]

William Shatner says he would star in Quentin Tarantino’s “Star Trek” movie if the script was to his liking

William Shatner as Captain Kirk in Star Trek

It had been  revealed that Quentin Tarantino pitched a Star Trek film to JJ Abrams and Paramount, and that we should take the news very seriously. Tarantino had met for hours with writers Mark L. Smith, Lindsey Beer, and Drew Pearce. The goal was to  kick around ideas for this to possibly happen. Rumors indicate that Smith, who wrote The Revenant, seems to be the man for the job. Tarantino has stipulated the film will require to be R rated, and Paramount and Abrams are okay with that. There has NEVER been a "Star Trek," or "Star Wars" movie for that matter, that hasn't been rated PG-13.  Of course, we know that an R-rated movie is not Box-Office kiss of death anymore, as Fox's Deadpool justifiably reminded us that a few years ago. 

Now comes the news that William Shatner, Captain James T. Kirk, would love to star in the movie, provided the screenplay is to his liking. Shatner responded to somebody on Twitter when asked:

Depends on the script but if it was good then absolutely. Why not? https://t.co/qaf9Bolg21
— William Shatner (@WilliamShatner) January 24, 2018

Shatner was not asked to appear in J.J. Abrams' 2009 and 2013 Star Trek reboots and the rumor seemed to indicate he wasn't too happy about that. So this would be a much appreciated welcome back for Captain Kirk.

Zack Snyder ‘likes’ social media post on Joss Whedon leaving “Batgirl”

Whedon’s involvement with "Justice League" seemed to be in pursuit of crushing Snyder's vision in favor of his. There were suppoedly endless rewrites of Snyder's original screenplay, reshoots,  etc. All this is an attempt to course-correct the DCEU. There have also been rumors that Snyder was actually fired and didn't just step down due to personal issues.  I must, however, command Snyder for being rather quiet and unpronounced through this whole ordeal. The WB has shown interest in a possible Snyder Director's Cut of the film, especially after a petition with hundreds of thousands of signatures was unleashed to the public last year.

Fiona Zheng, who started the the Snyder Cut website, shared a photo of a tweet reporting on Whedon quitting "Batgirl" after creative differences. Her caption reads, “For today, the only bad news is these media/press still think Whedon out was bad to DCEU!” A post which Mr. Snyder actually liked.

According to Screenrant: “Whedon did not (in the words of producer Charles Roven) “help Zack finish his vision.” He massively overhauled the team-up film, eschewing the tone and plot points Snyder had set up for his trilogy in favor of a more light-hearted approach that looked to ape The Avengers more than anything. Considering how things turned out, it’s understandable (and, quite frankly, human) for Snyder to take a little enjoyment out of Whedon’s Batgirlfalling through.”

Gaspar Noe's new movie will be titled “Psyché”



I have love/hate relationship with Gaspar Noé's films. I thought the absolutely unsubtle, intense rape drama “Irreversible” was an ambitious and, quite frankly, fascinating film, “Enter The Void”is to me, one of the very best movies this decade had to offer, but I absolutely loathed “Love” his sexually explicit film about l'amour which featured actual actors having sex with legit penetration. 

His next film is titled “Psyché” and is being funded by Tax Shelter Belgium, its budget is reported to be around $3.1 million U.S. and will be a nostalgic look a the the ’90s.

Here’s the synopsis:

"In the mid 90’s, about twenty urban dancers joined together for a 3-day rehearsal in a closed down boarding school located at the heart of a forest, to share one last dance. They then make one last party around a large sangria bowl."

"Quickly, the atmosphere becomes charged and a strange madness will seize them the whole night. If it seems obvious to them that they have been drugged, they neither know by who nor why. And it’s soon impossible for them to resist to their neuroses and psychoses, numbed by the hypnotic and the increasing electric rhythm of the music… While some feel in paradise, most of them plunge into hell.'

Sounds Noe-esque to me. The film is set for a two-week shoot, and according to The Playlist, "the first cut could be ready by June." 

Trump suggests movies should have ratings system to stop gun violence (They already do)

Image result for trump mpaa

The Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) was founded in 1922  to ensure that American films had a "clean moral tone". In 1968, they eventually established the  the Classification and Rating Administration, which began issuing ratings for films to help determine what films are appropriate for their children. Those ratings are quite universally known by now for anybody that goes to the movies (G, PG, PG-13. R, and NC-17), hell, it's basically ingrained in the American way of life by now.

However, don't tell that to Donald Trump. The 45th President of the United States of America has recently been goin through a tumultuous time trying to find a way to stop gun violence from being a recurrent thing in the country. The shooting in Parkland, FL, which took the lives of more than 17 students and teachers, has had the President going through an assortment of different, somtimes kooky ways, to prevent such a tragedy from happening again.  The president even layed forth the idea of arming school teachers during that meeting Thursday with state lawmakers. At that same meeting, Trump targeted video games and purpoted the violent mindset it might bring to some youths: "We have to do something about what [kids are] seeing and how they're seeing it," Trump stated. "And also video games. I'm hearing more and more people say the level of violence on video games is shaping more and more people's thoughts."

However, the comment that caught movie fans' attention was Trump's argument that violent movies might be to blame for mass shootings in the United States. The real kicker, however, was his problem-solving idea that we should implement a ratings system for movies.

“You see these movies, they’re so violent. And yet a kid is able to see the movie if sex isn’t involved, but killing is involved. And maybe they have to put a rating system for that. You get into a whole very complicated, very big deal but the fact is that you are having movies come out that are so violent with the killing and everything else that maybe that’s another thing we’re going to have to discuss.”

We don't really know if Trump has any idea the MPAA actually exists or if, maybe, his plan is to make the rules stricter, but something tells us it might be the former. We just wouldn't be surprised if Trump thinks he's the first person to come up with the "genius" idea of movie ratings, but it gave us a chuckle and made us think that maybe, just maybe, he's totally oblivious to the way these things work.

“The Shape of Water” accused of plagiarism, again.

Image result for the shape of water

‘Tis the season to smear. You can always expect smear campaigns to arise every Oscar season, after all the nasty feuding for awards love is nothing new in Hollywood. “Saving Private Ryan” dealt with it in 1998 when it was accused of erasing British presence in the opening D-Day combat, there was the complete scrub of homosexuality in “A Beautiful Mind,” “Slumdog Millionaire” severely underpaying its Indian child actors, “Zero Dark Thirty,” supposedly, promoting torture and how can we forget last year’s “La La Land,” which was accused of not being an authentic enough portrayal of  Jazz oh, and for being “too-white.” You understand the gist of it, smear campaigns are Hollywood traditions that date back many years. People will find something to nitpick about and hate on, especially if you’re the front runner.

With all that being said, this year is surely no exception. Not many big studio films have had to deal with the amount of accusations Guillermo del Toro’s “The Shape of Water” has had these last few months. It all started with  students from the Netherlands Film Academy claiming that the premise of their short film “The Space Between Us,” was ripped off by del Toro. Both films were about women falling for fish men at a laboratory. Meanwhile director Jean-Pierre Jeunet called plagiarism when he pointed out similarities between a dance scene in his 1991 classic “Delicatessen” which took place in a sofa but slowly delved into musically moving body rhythms. And now a third accusation. Late playwright Paul Zindel’s representatives have filed a copyright infringement lawsuit in which they claim del Toro lifted elements from Zindel's play "Let Me Hear Your Whisper," which dealt with a woman falling for a dolphin a top-secret laboratory. Fox Searchlight immediately fired back in a statement saying: “Guillermo del Toro has never read nor seen Mr Zindel’s play in any form.”

Del Toro’s romantic fantasy is nominated for 13 Oscars and currently the front-runner to win Best Picture come March 4th, so it is not surprising that these attacks are occurring precisely at this moment in time. However, given the fact that they all have to do with plagiarism, it must be quite disheartening for del Toro whose film does deal with familiar cinematic tropes but still feels like something we've never seen before. It's a testament to his filmmaking talent that he managed to bring freshness to a story as old as time. We all know there can only be so many creative plots to go around in storytelling, which would explain why a fairy tale such as "The Shape of Water" is being attacked for stealing ideas. The film feels familiar but, at the same time, incredible original and fresh. Suffice to say, different people having the same idea is not necessarily a rare occurrence in TV's, movies and books. Hell, even in music there are only so many chord progressions you can come up with.

Paul Schrader: “Before, you were always dealing with people who came up through the movies and who loved the movies,but in the last 10 or 15 years, the people who finance movies don’t particularly like movies. They have a financial model. And if you don’t adhere you get replaced."

First Reformed is Paul Schrader’s  latest film: “it harks back  to the first script I wrote. It feels like the end of a 50-year cycle”

“Before, you were always dealing with people who came up through the movies and who loved the movies,” sighs Schrader. “So you could always sit down together and find a resolution to any disagreement. But in the last 10 or 15 years, the people who finance movies don’t particularly like movies or particularly watch movies. They have a financial model. And if you adhere to the model, you can work. And if you don’t, you get replaced. And that’s what I fell into with Dying of the Light. I had written the script and they hired me as director and I assumed they had hired me because they had some respect for me.”

[The Irish Times]

Denis Villeneuve wishes we hadn’t known Harrison Ford was in “Blade Runner 2049,” and so do we

Before “Blade Runner 2049” opened, Denis Villeneuve hoped that we wouldn’t know much about his film:

“I think that it’s great for an audience to experience the movie as [critics] did, which is that you have no preconceived idea. I think that for me, myself as a cinephile, I love to receive a movie being almost a virgin, knowing as little as possible. There’s a hunger among bloggers right now to be the first one to spoil everything, and that’s sad a little bit because it diminishes the pleasure of the audience,” Villeneuve said in October.

“… people want to know too many things before. They should read about the movie after they see it, not before,” he added later that month.

Now he says that not only did he not want us to know anything, he actually didn't even want us to know that Harrison Ford was in the movie.

“Listen, as a film director I would love to keep everything a secret, I would love the audience just to trust and come to the theater having not seen anything of the movie,” Villeneuve said on the Empire Podcast. “Because of course, when you design the film you try to create surprises, tension… at the end of the day it would have been tough because everyone knew that Harrison was on the project, but yes, the answer I would have loved the audience not to know how he appears, where he appears, yeah.”

A peeve I had with BR2049 was that it was almost a foregone conclusion how Deckard was going to be introduced to us, come on admit it, and when it did happen it was rather dull and uninspiring, it's the glaring flaw of the film. Imagine how incredible that would have been? Not knowing Ford was in it. 

I'm torn between thinking BR2049 is a good movie or a great movie because of the Ford section, except for that great hologram fight sequence, which leads to a kidnapping I rather wasn't that interested in. There must have been a disconnect between studio and diretcor because we all knew the actor was in it just based on official production photos.

[Flickering Myth]

Brendan Fraser Says Former HFPA President Sexually Harassed Him in 2003

Brendan Fraser was all over Hollywood in the early 90's up until the early-aughts ("Encino Man," "Airheads," "George of the Jungle," "Gods and Monsters," (far and away his best film) "The Mummy," "The Mummy Returns," "The Quiet American,""Crash," "Journey to the Center of the Earth," and "The Mummy 3." Not all movies I would recommend but all hits and he had screen presence to spare, tremendous screen presence. 

Something happened after that third "Mummy" movie, which a remarkable and well-written GQ profile by Zach Baron entitled “the stupendous rise and surprising disappearance of [a] once ubiquitous movie star” examines.

In the article, which was published today, Fraser basically insinuates that he backed away from Hollywood, in part because he was sexually assaulted by former president of the Hollywood Foreign Press Association Philip Berk, this event supposedly occurred at an HFPA luncheon in 2003. 

According to Fraser, Berk grabbed his ass, and that “one of his fingers touches me in the taint. And he starts moving it around … I felt like someone had thrown invisible paint on me,” Fraser said.

Fraser’s representatives asked the HFPA afterwards for a written apology and they did in fact write it, but it “admitted to no wrongdoing” and that stated that “Mr. Fraser’s version is a total fabrication.” Fraser eventually became depressed post-incident, which he states ensuingly  “made me retreat. It made me feel reclusive.” 

We all hope Fraser finds a way to make it back onscreen, not just for nostalgia’s sake but also for the fact that he is a nice guy that was dealt a bad hand somewhere along this crazy Hollywood ride he had. He has tried to stage a sort of comeback of late with HBO’s The Affair in ’16, and Jeffrey Wells has claimed that Fraser’s AOL encounter with Ricky Camilleri “is regarded as one of the saddest such interviews in entertainment history.” I’ll have to listen to that later today.

Up next for Fraser is FX’s "Trust," which is "Slumdog Millionaire" scribe Simon Beaufoy‘s miniseries on the John Paul Getty III kidnapping which is said to better than Ridley Scott's 'All the Money in the World," which was just released this past December to mixed reviews and revolved around the same story.